Any rehabilitation efforts in the past have been unsuccessful. Young offenders could take it as a message that they have no future and no hope of becoming something else other than a criminal. It is a hot issue that is making society question what could be the best solution to dealing with adolescent offenders.
When juveniles are being tried as adults, they may become more aggressive, more hopeless, and more violent. OpinionFront Staff Last Updated: That is, the judge waives any protection that a juvenile court provides to a minor offender, treating him as an adult that should be punished accordingly.
Courts Focus On Age Instead of Crime The juvenile courts have a strong tendency to only focus on the age of the offender rather than the actual nature and reason for the crime that they committed. By putting a juvenile into adult court, you are also effecting their adult criminal record.
Juvenile crimes on the rise are not something society should ignore. A parent must take the time to teach a child right from wrong and how to handle their responsibilities. Taking a life is murder regardless of the age of the offender, and the penalties to be imposed must not discriminate.
Typically, juveniles who display a propensity for committing crime will continue to do so, even as they get older. Proponents for trying juveniles as adults believe that a crime is a crime, even if the person who committed it was very young at the time.
That is, the judge waives any protection that a juvenile court provides to a minor offender, treating him as an adult that should be punished accordingly.
The Right to a Trial By Jury The juvenile courts do not have a jury, and offenders are not given a proper trial. If these offenders will be tried as adults and punished to the full extent of the law, they would probably think twice about committing a crime or violating the law.
The charge is a particularly serious offense. But those who oppose trying juveniles in an adult court argue that it does not benefit the suspect or the society, if they are punished the same way as adults.
Cons A crime is a crime. Attacking juvenile crime lowers the overall crime rate and allows us to live in a society that is much safer.
But if minors are tried in an adult court, there will be a jury that will help decide whether or not they are guilty. In a 12 year old girl killed her entire family for not approving of her boyfriend. Juvenile crimes on the rise are not something society should ignore.
Youth services required to help the minor would be lengthy. This is a very high number because teenagers have full control over their thoughts and actions. He was treated as an adult when he was convicted. In Wisconsin, however, any juvenile over the age of 10 who is charged with homicide or attempted homicide will be automatically tried as adults, which makes the debate moot and academic.
It is only after their adolescent years are over that children become mature and begin to understand important concepts like society and expectations to name a few.
So throwing them in jail with adult offenders would take away any hope of rehabilitation. Despite them losing their naivety and becoming cold blooded criminals, children are children.
Punishing them for their wrongdoings teaches them accountability, which they can bring with them until they grow old. Other juveniles who may be considering committing a crime will also view the harsh punishment of their peers as a powerful deterrent.
Whereas in a juvenile court, offenders are given curfews, put under house arrest or sent to counseling.
Now the waiver can be granted if the case meets the following factors: It is believed that when children as young as years of age commit a crime, they do not necessarily grow up to become criminals; yet when they are punished in the same manner as adults, the odds of this could somehow change. A juvenile who is tried as an adult could end up being scared straight, which will deter them from continuing to break the law.
Is it okay to accept the argument that they are unaware of the gravity of the crime at the time that they committed it. So throwing them in jail with adult offenders would take away any hope of rehabilitation. He was only 14 years old.
Brings justice to the victims Some offenses may be forgivable, but not for extreme crimes similar to what the Wisconsin girls committed. But the fact remains that trying minors as adults has its share of pros and cons.
So the big question now is should we show sympathy for the girls or the victim. A 10 year old boy who shows no remorse for his crime would still be given an extremely lax sentence because of his age.
No matter who commits it. Pros and Cons Video Statistics and age limits Should Teens be Tried as Adults? By: Katherine Bowes "Old enough to do the crime, old enough to do the time. This popular refrain reduces a complex reality to simplistic thetoric.
Whether or not you agree to invoke the waiver petition depends on which side of the fence you are on. But the fact remains that trying minors as adults has its share of pros and cons. List of Pros of Juveniles Being Tried as Adults. 1. Deter and minimize crimes committed by minors There is no denying that crimes committed by minors are on the rise.
The following article will put forth certain arguments based on this issue, and the pros and cons of whether juveniles should be tried as adults or not. Trying Juveniles as Adults: Cons A crime is a crime.
List of Cons of Juveniles Being Tried As Adults. 1. Risks in Adult Prison When child offenders are tried as adults, they go through the same process as adult offenders. List of Cons of Juveniles Being Tried As Adults. 1.
Risks in Adult Prison When child offenders are tried as adults, they go through the same process as adult offenders. In the contrary, the Con side argues that juveniles should not be tried as adults, and the juvenile courts are necessary because children cannot be tried in the same manner as adults Juvenile Justice: Pros and Cons on Trying Juveniles as Adults.Pros and cons of adolescence being tried as adults